A collection of clothes, more like the stars one would view within the highest tech planetarium, was the impression I had of
Lagerfeld's Chanel Spring 2010 Haute Couture Collection. The preponderance of silver, and everything pale hued and shot with light as though leafed and glazed in star dust made for a very interesting experience. It felt more like a constellation than a collection.
New techniques were employed that I won't pretend to understand but will only say that he found a way to make seams disappear in the many suits that opened the show. Karl is never satisfied with the status quo in any way which makes his collections consistently rise above and stand out from the pack. The suits were beautiful despite
Lagerfeld's clear preference for culottes over skirts. Standing still they were interesting, moving, less so. What caught my eye more than anything was his take on the chemise
. Many of the short day and cocktail dresses were all variations on this shape. What was even more arresting were the gowns that continued this theme. I've always felt that this is
a shape most flattering to a vast array of body types. Accentuate the positive
which invariably is the top of a dress, slide gracefully over the middle, which is often the problem area, and then narrow at the hem. This creates a long line that I personally find very sexy. The eye and mind are left to their imagination. Each model is literally embraced by these clothes.
Embroidery and embellishment were more essential than purely decorative on surfaces and as collars or straps to anchor these confections. Draping was more organic and spiraling than tortured . There was no need to advertise the brilliance of his work rooms when most everything they do looks magical.This is not to say the collection was without it Waterloos. Every collection has at least one. There were some awkward
and unflattering choices, but they were infused with a certain humor that made them amusing. The detail th
at seemed the most jarring, beyond dresses resembling over-whipped cotton candy, was Karl's choice of the human accessory,
Baptiste Giabiconi ( some interesting pics, so don't forget to click!) . He does little for me except to make me think that
Lagerfeld has created a living doll resembling his idealized vision of himself. That's just me, but his presence is becoming compelling, nonetheless.
When all is said and sewn,when you've made it there's no need to fake it.
(*This blog edited to change links and add pics 8Feb.2010)
6 comments:
great analysis, I love your blog.
Very accurate analysis, I couldn't agree more. I really enjoy your blog and have been following you for a while! Wonderful.
ahh! awesome review fluff! left me smiling- so true about Baptiste!
This was THE couture collection of the season in my opinion. Not too costumey, and ultra luxe. Too bad about Baptiste and his tin man suit though.
I can only believe that the fluff over "hiding the seams" is some kind of marketing scheme, especially since I think I can see a fly-front zipper on one set of culottes. Why not hide the zipper, say, in the back seam?
And Fluff, women with hour-glass or pear shapes can't wear this style-it only emphasizes the circumferences without delineating the waist. Ask me how I know!
I think the culotte-suits will be very popular (and practical) for ladies who lunch.
Dear Anon, "the hiding the seams" aspect is actually more than a marketing ploy. Click on the detail photos of some of the suit jackets on Style.com and you will see for yourself that something was done to more or less 'rub out' the seams. I don't know what was done exactly, but it does look quite interesting and nifty. You can see where the seams used to be, but like I said, it looks like the lines were rubbed out by some unique stitching technique.
Post a Comment